Deciding how to value pre-revenue companies is hard. There are many signals to process, and even after you’ve taken all of them into account, the final estimate is as much art as science. Deciding how much a startup should be worth is like deciding how much a one-of-a-kind painting should be worth: there are guidelines to move you in the right direction, but in the end you’re basically making an educated guess. What’s worse, you don’t truly know if your guess was good until long after you’ve made the investment. Despite that bleak disclaimer, there are heuristics for calculating the value of a startup – even one that has yet to make a dollar in revenue.
First, let’s start with a few thought experiments. For each thought experiment, let’s pretend you’ve been approached by a startup called ShopBetter, a company focused on improving shopping for buyers and for retailers, and you have the opportunity to acquire a 10% stake in the company. Your goal is to determine how much that 10% should be worth.
Thought Experiment #1: Founding Team
ShopBetter was founded last week and the founders know they want to improve shopping, but they haven’t decided exactly how they’ll do that. However, they are committing to work on something together for at least the next 5-10 years.
If the founders are your neighbors who don’t know anything about technology or shopping, then 10% might be worth a few hundred or a few thousand dollars (if you happen to be a generous gambler).
If the founders are great engineers and salespeople that you’ve worked with, then 10% might be worth tens or thousands of dollars. Maybe even a million dollars.
Thought experiment #2: Traction and Expected Near-Term Revenues
ShopBetter recently released a service that lets retailers learn more about their customers. ShopBetter’s business proposition is that richer demographic info will help those retailers promote and target their products more effectively.
If ShopBetter has 3 pilot customers who are nowhere near becoming paying customers, then 10% might be worth a few hundred thousands dollars (mainly because a finished product with potential is still worth something).
If there are 50 pilot customers, the plan is to charge each of them $1000 per month, and you believe (through surveying a few pilot customers) that about half of 50 will become paying users, then you might value 10% of ShopBetter at something like $500k or $1m.
If the company has 1 pilot customer and plans to charge $50k/month, and you think the customer has a 50% chance of converting to paying, you might value a 10% stake at $300k - $500k. Even though a 50% chance of one customer at $50k/month has the same expected value as 25 customers at $1k/month, the proposition is more risky because it depends on a single client. As a result, the valuation take a hit.
Thought experiment #3: Growth and Engagement
The team at ShopBetter has been busy and launched a mobile app 3 months ago. Based on your research of similar shopping apps, you think a typical user’s lifetime value (LTV) will be about $2.
If the app has 100k users and the user base is growing 15% per month, then 10% of ShopBetter might be worth $500k.
If the app has 100k users and the user base is growing 30% per month, then 10% of ShopBetter might be worth $1.25m.
If the app has 100k users and the user base is shrinking 10% per month, then 10% of ShopBetter might be worth $200k. There’s still potential value in the company if they can figure out how to improve their app and get the user base to grow, but a shrinking user base is scary signal.
Additionally, user engagement is important. 100k users who log in monthly are not as valuable as 50k users who each use the app for 20 minutes per day.
Thought experiment #4: Market Size
You’ve analyzed the market for ShopBetter’s consumer app – the one where each new user is worth $2 in revenue – and have come up with a realistic estimate of the max number of consumers ShopBetter can expect to acquire.
If there are 500k potential users, 10% of the company might be worth $50k.
If there are 10m potential users, 10% of the company might be worth $1m.
If there are 500m potential users and you think ShopBetter has a good chance of acquiring most of those users, then the value of a 10% stake is only limited by your optimism and your bank balance.
Thought experiment #5: Competition
You’ve take a good look at ShopBetter’s founding team, its 100k app downloads so far, and its market potential, and now you turn your focus to the competitive landscape.
If ShopBetter has no competitors, you might value a 10% stake at $500k.
If it has two competitors which each have 25k users, you might value a 10% stake at $400k.
If ShopBetter has several competitors with millions of users each, and Amazon just announced a similar product, you might value the 10% stake at $200k.
These thought experiments are meant to show how different attributes contribute to the value of a company. (The numbers are meant to be illustrative, not exact.)
In addition to these factors, there are other things at play when determining valuations:
Market forces. It doesn’t matter if you think a company is worth $5m if other investors all think it’s worth $7m. If the market says it’s $7m then it’s $7m.
Quality of other investors. If a startup has very notable investors, it might be able to command a small premium. Having a founder’s parents invest $250k is a much weaker signal than having Sequoia or Greylock invest $250k. Additionally, institutional investors have deeper pockets, and if a startup has funding from such investors then there’s a greater chance it will be able to to raise more money if it needs to. (According to CBInsights, the rate of follow-on funding jumps from 35% to 47% for companies that raise seed money from VCs.)
Comparables. If most comparable startups are valued within a certain price range, then that price range provides an anchoring point. For example, if a typical B2B startup with a recently launched pilot product and 1-5 non-paying pilot customers is usually worth $4m-$6m, then any new startup in that category will be valued similarly unless there are strong signals that drive the valuation up or down.
Market forces and comparables are especially potent. Oftentimes, a founder will look at what valuations their friends are raising at then pick a number out of thin air. Then they offer that price to several investors, and if investors don’t push back, that becomes the final price.
The way that I approach valuations – and I’m speaking for myself and not for other partners in my fund – is to first look at comparable companies to get a baseline value for a company. I then try to make reasonable adjustments for exceptionally good founding teams, markets, products, or growth/usage metrics. In the end, I come up with an estimate that I can compare to the estimates of my partners. If our estimates are in a narrow range then we’re satisfied; if they’re wildly different then we scrutinize our individual assumptions until we’re on the same page.
On final note, valuations do matter, but exact valuations do not. The average return of an angel investment is 2.6x over 3.5 years, and it’s okay if your valuation estimates are off by 5-10% once in a while. (An average, well-diversified portfolio should return about 2.6x, and 90% of that is still a healthy return). For a professional fund, the goal is to have better than average returns (e.g. 4x or 8x), and in that case the quality of companies that you invest in becomes more important than your ability to calculate their valuations to the nearest dollar.
(This was originally an answer on Quora.)